OM606 240mm flywheel

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average

Jambo

GTA2056V

88

01-05-2015, 01:39 PM #1

So on the weekend I had a little time to do something and opted to remove the ring gear plate off the OM606 and fit the 240mm Dual mass flywheel I got.
All went well until I discovered that the flywheel does not "seat" nicely.
The protrusion from the crankshaft is longer than the recess on the flywheel.
I can fit the washer from the original torque converter but that would also shift the ring gear further away from the started sprocket.
Anyone come across this?

Attached Files

Image(s)

Jambo

01-05-2015, 01:39 PM #1

Attached Files

Image(s)

Petar

7.5mm M pump

459

01-05-2015, 01:59 PM #2

I remember somebody in the forum coming across the same problem, he just ground it down so the flywheel would fit.

Petar

01-05-2015, 01:59 PM #2

I remember somebody in the forum coming across the same problem, he just ground it down so the flywheel would fit.

Druk

Holset

297

01-05-2015, 02:36 PM #3

That's odd. My DMF (ex M104) bolted straight up to the 606 no problem. Have you tried a depth gauge on it cos it looks like it should fit from the pics.

This post was last modified: 01-05-2015, 02:38 PM by Druk.

Druk

01-05-2015, 02:36 PM #3

That's odd. My DMF (ex M104) bolted straight up to the 606 no problem. Have you tried a depth gauge on it cos it looks like it should fit from the pics.

barrote

Superturbo

1,627

01-05-2015, 02:56 PM #4

thats a bit strange that fly wheel , does not resembles mine at any point

FD,
Powered by tractor fuel

barrote

01-05-2015, 02:56 PM #4

thats a bit strange that fly wheel , does not resembles mine at any point

FD,
Powered by tractor fuel

MrHope

GT2256V

112

01-05-2015, 03:33 PM #5

http://www.superturbodiesel.com/std/Thre...W108-280SE

.
W460 300GD with om605 Turbo 6mm pump Build Thread!
W124 300D 1985 (daily driver)

MrHope

01-05-2015, 03:33 PM #5

http://www.superturbodiesel.com/std/Thre...W108-280SE

.
W460 300GD with om605 Turbo 6mm pump Build Thread!
W124 300D 1985 (daily driver)

Jambo

GTA2056V

88

01-06-2015, 12:13 AM #6

(01-05-2015, 03:33 PM)MrHope http://www.superturbodiesel.com/std/Thre...W108-280SE

Thanks all, seems it is a know problem. Dunno why I could not find anything while doing the search before.

Jambo

01-06-2015, 12:13 AM #6

(01-05-2015, 03:33 PM)MrHope http://www.superturbodiesel.com/std/Thre...W108-280SE

Thanks all, seems it is a know problem. Dunno why I could not find anything while doing the search before.

MrHope

GT2256V

112

01-06-2015, 03:54 AM #7

i wouldnt use the spacer, as the starter gear gets in another position.
best would be to grind dow the flange a few mm...

.
W460 300GD with om605 Turbo 6mm pump Build Thread!
W124 300D 1985 (daily driver)

MrHope

01-06-2015, 03:54 AM #7

i wouldnt use the spacer, as the starter gear gets in another position.
best would be to grind dow the flange a few mm...

.
W460 300GD with om605 Turbo 6mm pump Build Thread!
W124 300D 1985 (daily driver)

Jambo

GTA2056V

88

01-06-2015, 06:06 AM #8

(01-06-2015, 03:54 AM)MrHope i wouldnt use the spacer, as the starter gear gets in another position.
best would be to grind dow the flange a few mm...

I agree with the spacer.
My plan is to machine the flywheel slightly to allow the extra flange to go in. My reasoning is it is cleaner and also a flywheel is cheaper than a crank if something goes wrong.

Jambo

01-06-2015, 06:06 AM #8

(01-06-2015, 03:54 AM)MrHope i wouldnt use the spacer, as the starter gear gets in another position.
best would be to grind dow the flange a few mm...

barrote

Superturbo

1,627

01-06-2015, 02:59 PM #9

noe that i read your post carefully i understand your problema, but the problem is that u may have to worry with the distance to the clutch bearing. usually the starter gear can acomodate the 3mm of the whasher. the thing is with the clutch bearing.
but that all depend on wich gear box u will use!
regards

FD,
Powered by tractor fuel

barrote

01-06-2015, 02:59 PM #9

FD,
Powered by tractor fuel

Petar

7.5mm M pump

459

01-06-2015, 03:32 PM #10

He is using a dual mass flywheel with the pilot bearing integrated in it. So it isn't a problem.

Scracth that i figured out that you are talking about the throw out bearing. So the problem remains

This post was last modified: 01-06-2015, 03:44 PM by Petar.

Petar

01-06-2015, 03:32 PM #10

He is using a dual mass flywheel with the pilot bearing integrated in it. So it isn't a problem.

Scracth that i figured out that you are talking about the throw out bearing. So the problem remains

hooblah

Holset

401

01-06-2015, 06:45 PM #11

I dont see the problem with machining it? The flywheel will be located in the correct position, machining it only adds clearance for the spigot.

hooblah

01-06-2015, 06:45 PM #11

I dont see the problem with machining it? The flywheel will be located in the correct position, machining it only adds clearance for the spigot.

Jambo

GTA2056V

88

01-06-2015, 11:55 PM #12

Hi Guys,
The spigot does not seem to be a problem.
Machining the flywheel will allow the flywheel to get closer to the face of the crankshaft.
As other posters said< I could also take away some meat from the crankshaft flange and achieve the same.
Will let you all know how it pans out.

Jambo

01-06-2015, 11:55 PM #12

View a Printable Version

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average

Users browsing this thread:
6 Guest(s)